2021 MAZDA CX-30 from MAZDA in Vehicle gets a Reviewboard buying read based on product details, price context, and buyer feedback. Reviewboard has a current national single-unit average price reference. No member discount is attached right now.
Government crash-test scores are separate from Reviewboard's own score and opinion shown above.
What is wrong: Mazda North American Operations (Mazda) is recalling certain 2020-2021 CX-30 vehicles. When fully opened, the power liftgate may partially lower unexpectedly when the vehicle is parked facing uphill on a slope.
Why it matters: If the power liftgate unexpectedly lowers while a person is accessing the rear storage area of the vehicle, it can increase their risk of injury.
How it will be fixed: Mazda will notify owners, and dealers will update the power liftgate control module software and inspect the serial number of the power liftgate drive unit, replacing it if necessary, free of charge. The recall began April 8, 2021. Owners may contact Mazda customer service at 1-800-222-5500 option 4. Mazda's number for this recall is 4621B.
Date reported to the U.S. government: 18/02/2021
What is wrong: Mazda North American Operations (Mazda) is recalling certain 2021 Mazda3 and CX-30 vehicles. Air may suddenly leak from the tire air valve.
Why it matters: A sudden air leak from the tire air valve may cause a loss of vehicle control while driving, increasing the risk of a crash.
How it will be fixed: Mazda will notify owners, and dealers will replace all four tire air valves with new parts, free of charge. The recall began April 6, 2021. Owners may contact Mazda customer service at 1-800-222-5500 Option 4. Mazda's number for this recall is 4721B.
Date reported to the U.S. government: 22/02/2021
The 2021 MAZDA CX-30 is presented here with a Reviewboard rating of 72.0 out of 100 and an opinion of poor.
This assessment reflects the specific context provided by the editorial review, which weighs the vehicle's known safety history against its overall standing. The score of 72.0 places this vehicle in a middle ground, but the accompanying opinion of poor is driven by specific, actionable safety information that buyers must consider before making a purchase.
When evaluating this vehicle, it is important to understand what the rating signifies. While the numerical score suggests a moderate level of quality based on aggregated data, the underlying opinion signals caution. This caution stems directly from documented issues related to mandatory recalls affecting specific components of the 2021 model year.
The primary concerns identified relate to safety recalls issued by the manufacturer. Specifically, there are two active recalls that owners of this vehicle should be aware of. One addresses the structure of the hatchback and liftgate, noting a potential risk if the power liftgate unexpectedly lowers while the vehicle is parked on an incline. The remedy for this involves software updates and inspection of the drive unit. A second recall concerns the tire air valves, warning that a sudden air leak could lead to a loss of vehicle control during driving. Both recalls were initiated in April 2021.
In addition to these specific safety matters, the general consumer feedback available does not provide extensive owner sentiment regarding day-to-day performance or satisfaction. The reviewboard analysis noted that while the overall score is moderate, the presence of these official issues necessitates a more cautious approach for potential buyers. This means that while the vehicle has an established market position, prospective owners must verify the status of these specific recalls with a local dealer before finalizing any purchase.
Regarding the context of value, the estimated national average price for this type of vehicle in the U.S. market is around $24,500 USD. This sets the baseline expectation for the cost associated with owning this model.
Buyers should verify several key points before moving forward. First, confirm that any necessary recalls, specifically 21V086000 and 21V101000, have been addressed by the seller or are covered under warranty. Second, investigate the reported consumer complaints, which include reports related to the engine, electrical system, forward collision avoidance, and visibility/wiper systems, as these areas were flagged in the safety data. Finally, since no specific performance measurements or detailed owner experiences were supplied, prospective owners should seek out personal feedback from current or former owners to gain a complete picture of real-world ownership.
In conclusion, while the 2021 MAZDA CX-30 exists within a generally acceptable safety framework as reflected by its score of 72.0, the presence of documented recalls concerning structural components and tire safety mandates that potential buyers prioritize verifying the resolution of these specific issues. The final recommendation remains cautious due to these outstanding manufacturer notifications.
The Reviewboard rating for this vehicle is 72.0.
When approaching the purchase of a 2021 MAZDA CX-30, the focus must shift from general appeal to meticulous due diligence concerning the specific safety notifications provided by the manufacturer. The existence of active recalls related to the liftgate structure and tire valves means that the vehicle’s current condition is directly tied to whether these mandated repairs have been completed. Prospective buyers should treat the status of these two specific campaigns not as optional information, but as mandatory prerequisites for ownership. Before finalizing any deal, insist on documentation from the seller confirming that all necessary software updates and physical inspections related to campaign 21V086000 and 21V101000 have been successfully executed. This step moves the evaluation beyond the general market price estimate and into concrete, verifiable safety compliance.
Furthermore, since detailed owner feedback is absent from this review, shoppers must rely heavily on external channels to supplement the official data. While the provided information points to specific mechanical concerns that require manufacturer intervention, understanding the broader ownership experience requires seeking out community discussions. Buyers should actively search for owner forums or local owner groups where real-world experiences regarding daily driving, long-term reliability, and satisfaction with features like the engine and electrical systems are shared. This external input will help bridge the gap left by the limited internal review data, offering context on how these mechanical components operate under typical conditions beyond the scope of official safety reporting.
Ultimately, the decision hinges on balancing the known risks against the vehicle's inherent qualities. The score of 72.0 reflects a product that has passed basic scrutiny but carries specific, documented safety caveats that must be resolved by the owner. If a potential buyer is comfortable managing the process of verifying and ensuring the completion of the two noted recalls, and if they are willing to supplement the official data with community-sourced experiences regarding performance and ownership satisfaction, then this vehicle may be considered within their purchasing parameters. However, if these mandatory steps are overlooked or if the lack of owner feedback proves a significant deterrent, the inherent risks associated with the documented safety notifications become too high for a confident purchase.
Based strictly on the provided editorial assessment, the final recommendation is that while the vehicle exists in the market at an estimated price point near $24,500 USD, the presence of outstanding recalls necessitates extreme caution. The known issues are specific and actionable, demanding proactive verification from the buyer before commitment. Therefore, the decisive bottom line remains a cautious approach to this purchase, reflected by the Reviewboard score of 72.0/100 and the opinion poor.
